Lucas Olmeta ‘28 & Ben Kras ‘28

WUJUR (2026) | Cite this work

Abstract

The Ballon d’Or debate often reflects disagreement over whether the award recognizes pure on-pitch performance or a combination of performance, honors, and narrative. This tension implies two distinct analytical goals: evaluating performance-based “deservedness” and modeling how voters actually convert performances and achievements into rankings. We study the 2025 race with a nominee-only dataset and complementary methods—descriptive rankings, historical winner profiling, and within-season vote-share modeling—to address both perspectives. Using ridge regression with softmax normalization to map performance statistics and major trophies to expected voting outcomes, we find that including trophy indicators substantially improves ranking fidelity and identifies the correct winner on the held-out 2024–25 season. Uncertainty analysis via stratified bootstrap reveals clear predicted separation at the top of the ballot with the winner’s dominance robust across resampled training sets. Taken together, these approaches show how different defensible framings of “deservedness” yield distinct conclusions and clarify the gap between performance-based expectations and realized voting outcomes.

Main

This article is viewable by PDF download.

References

References for this work are viewable by PDF download.

Supplemental material

There is no supplemental material provided by the author(s) for this work.

About this article

Citation (APA)

Olmeta, L., & Kras, B. (2026). A Quantitative Analysis of the 2025 Ballon d’Or. WUJUR, 2(2), 23-32.

A DOI link will soon be supplied for this article and added to the above citation.

Author Information

Lucas, Olmeta. Washington University in St. Louis.
Corresponding Author. Send correspondence to l.e.olmeta@wustl.edu.

Ben, Kras. Washington University in St. Louis.
Corresponding Author. Send correspondence to

Additional Information and Declarations

There is no additional information or declarations provided by the author(s).

Peer Review

WUJUR thanks the anonymous Peer Reviewers who contributed to the review of this work.

Rights and Permissions

Individual articles © 2026 by their respective authors. Illustrations and images remain the property of their respective authors or rights holders and are reproduced here with permission or under fair use.

The author(s) may grant certain license permissions to the public.

Copyright © 2026. Washington University Journal of Undergraduate Research. All rights reserved for compilation, design, and editorial content.